Time proximity measures vs. evasive action measures for pedestrian conflicts in different traffic environments: case studies from four major cities

Ahmed Tageldin
Tarek Sayed
Khaled Shaaban

There has been a growing interest in using traffic conflicts for studying safety from a broader perspective than relying only on collision data. The analysis of traffic conflicts is typically performed through the calculation of traditional conflict severity indicators such as Time-To-Collision (TTC). These measures rely on road users getting within specific temporal and spatial proximity from each other and assume that proximity is a surrogate for conflict severity. However, this assumption may not be valid in some driving environments where close interactions between road users are common and sudden evasive actions are frequent. Therefore, it is suggested that evasive action-based conflict indicators can be considered a complimentary approach to understand and assess traffic conflicts in some less organized traffic environments. Pedestrian evasive action indicators are mainly reflected in variations of the spatio-temporal gait parameters (e.g., step frequency and step length). The objective of this paper is to compare the use of time proximity and evasive action-based conflict indicators in measuring the severity of conflicts for different traffic environments. Video data from intersections in four major cities with varying traffic environments is analyzed. The cities include: Shanghai, New York, Doha and Vancouver. The video data is analyzed using automated computer vision techniques to extract the pedestrian involved conflicts and to calculate various conflict indicators. The results showed the effectiveness of using pedestrian evasive action-based indicators in environments such as Shanghai as compared to time to collision. However, the evasive action measures didn’t show the same relevance in organized traffic environments such as Vancouver.



Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) workshop in Stockholm

An open seminar and workshop in Stockholm will be held on 25-26 April 2018. The workshop deals with the use of CBA as a basis for decision-making in the public sector. The workshop is organized by, among others, Professor Jan-Eric Nilsson, VTI.



Ulf Sandberg has been presented with the TTI Lifetime Achievement Award 2018

VTI’s Senior Research Leader Ulf Sandberg has been presented with the TTI Lifetime Achievement Award 2018 for his work on research into tyres and road surface.


Steps need to be taken to increase traffic safety of automated cars

Several steps are necessary to ensure that automated and connected cars will lead to increased traffic safety – everything from ensuring that technology takes vulnerable road users into account, to new forms of driver training. This has emerged in a position...


FALCON examines challenges in the transport sector

VTI is one of several important partners in the major FALCON project*, whose purpose is to create knowledge and insight regarding the transport sector. In an initial subproject, VTI has produced a manual on transport, logistics and multimodality.


VTI joined research cooperation in China

In December 2017 VTI became a member of China-Sweden Research Centre for Traffic Safety (CTS).


Swedish German research collaboration on Electric Road Systems

The project “Swedish-German research collaboration on Electric Road Systems” (CollERS) has now officially started. The goal of the project is to increase the common knowledge around Electric Road Systems by cooperation between Germany and Sweden and to...


Electric Road Systems Conference 2018

After a successful first conference in June 2017, the Swedish research and innovation platform for electric roads is arranging the second dedicated International Conference on Electric Road Systems (ERS) June 13th and 14th 2018.