Comparing productivity means to measure design-build pay-off

Torbjörn Stenbeck

The effect of design-build and other procurement decisions and strategies related to owner and contractor working more together has long been a topic of discussion. The cost and quality effects have however often been concluded in qualitative terms based on participants’ general feelings rather than by objective measurements. Most economics and evaluation literature define productivity as output/input. The first purpose in the current study was to develop methods to calculate construction productivity. The second purpose was to use one of them to compare the mean productivity of all design-build (DB) projects with design-bid-build (DBB) projects. When an extensive literature scan for prevailing definitions, methods and values delivered nothing useful, an own method to calculate productivity was developed and used. First overall annual productivity change was calculated, then the mean difference between DB and DBB, controlling for up to 20 variables. Input, the productivity denominator, was an infrastructure project’s total cost until completed. Output, the productivity numerator, was a weighed aggregation of its road length, railway length and a number of other cost-driving variables. A couple of methods to calculate productivity were prestudied by using annual report data, but none delivered a trustful result. We therefore asked for more precise data directly from the agency. Over 80 project managers were engaged to deliver us road and railway lengths, and about 20 other data variables, in their projects. The variable values were multiplied by expert-determined weights and added into a model cost representing the output. This output was divided by the real cost representing the input. Output/input = the project’s productivity. The means of all projects opened each year constituted a time series and the average annual change was calculated. The nominal annual decline turned out to be about -5 %. Corrected for general inflation, it was about -3 % and corrected with the higher road-works-index it was about -1 %.



Shipping and the environment – research meets reality

Centre for Transport Studies (CTS) in co-operation with Ports of Stockholm invite you to the seminar Shipping and the environment – research meets reality.



Simulation of cut-in by manually driven vehicles in platooning scenarios

A study in a VTI-driving simulator has showed that a platoon will be able to handle a cut in from a manually driven car. The results of this study have recently been presented at two conferences in Japan.



The five-year anniversary of European Road Profile Users' Group (ERPUG) Forum will take place at Ramboll head quarter, Copenhagen, Denmark October 19-20, 2017.


Self-driving buses in Sweden next year?

A self-driving, fossil-free bus. This idea might become reality through a forthcoming collaborative project involving the Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI), Linköping University and several other participants. The project group aim...


New climate-proof solutions for hard surfaces in cities

High-density road infrastructure that emphasise maximum durability and minimum maintenance create inflexible systems, which put increased stress on urban trees and lead to increased risk for flooding. Over the past five years, the ‘Climate-proof solutions for...


VTI is preparing for automated vehicles

Automation of traffic systems will lead to major changes. The European Union’s (EU) CoEXist research project began in June 2017 with the aim of preparing cities and road operators for the introduction of self-driving vehicles. The Swedish National Road and...


Vehicle Driver Monitoring: sleepiness and cognitive load

To prevent road crashes it is important to understand driver related contributing factors, which have been suggested to be the critical reason in 94 per cent of crashes. The overall aim of the project Vehicle Driver Monitoring has been to advance the...